Feedback from DroidsOnRoids #48
Comments
Yup, the author makes a solid point about testing. The visibility of some of the classes she mentions are there for a reason though. |
Maybe @pszklarska can give us more detailed feedback. We can not comment in the blog post and I don't find the DroidsOnRoids twitter :) |
Hi guys, nice to see your response for my article ;) As I wrote, there were some issues that bothered me while testing. I mentioned them in article, but if you need more info, I'll be glad to help. @pedrovgs why can't you comment in the blog post? |
hahaha I didn't see the comments section at the end of the "other posts" links. Sorry :) |
@pszklarska one of your suggestions is already in review #47 |
Great, so I wait for update :) |
@flipper83 @Serchinastico we have some feedback about Rosie in this blog post: http://www.thedroidsonroids.com/blog/android/rosie-lets-dive-into-clean-architecture/ There are some things we could improve like: change some methods visibility in the RosiePresenter to improve the class testability from the unit test point of view. What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: